Those who forget the past . . .
And here I was SSSOOOO proud of myself for going a whole week without any political garbage. Then, Bush has to go and delcare the Iraqi elections a "resounding success" before they're even over. I would think that he would have learned from his "Mission Accomplished" mistake. Aren't straight-talking-Texans like himself familiar with the old saying "Don't count your chickens before they're hatched"?
Even though the polls closed, there are still many things that could go wrong with the elections. Heck, look at all the problems vote tampering accusations have caused in the last 2 Presidential elections here! Couple that with the rediculous "inconsistencies" in the Afghan election, and does anyone honestly think the results of this election aren't going to be challenged? Plus, while I have no doubt that such a thing won't be allowed to happen, I just can't help but wonder: What if the winner of the election is someone the US really doesn't want in power in Iraq? What if whoever is elected tells the US to pull out? We've already publicly stated that we will pull our military out if asked to do so. So what happens if the newly elected gov't does exactly that? Especially since we've also already announced that we'll be there at least through 2006.
Bush is really getting ahead of himself (again). He's so incredibly eager to declare victory that he's not actually looking at reality. And he's just asking for something to occur that will require him to backpedal (again) and make up excuses (lies) to cover his arse, all the while making himself and our country look like foolish blowhards.
Even though the polls closed, there are still many things that could go wrong with the elections. Heck, look at all the problems vote tampering accusations have caused in the last 2 Presidential elections here! Couple that with the rediculous "inconsistencies" in the Afghan election, and does anyone honestly think the results of this election aren't going to be challenged? Plus, while I have no doubt that such a thing won't be allowed to happen, I just can't help but wonder: What if the winner of the election is someone the US really doesn't want in power in Iraq? What if whoever is elected tells the US to pull out? We've already publicly stated that we will pull our military out if asked to do so. So what happens if the newly elected gov't does exactly that? Especially since we've also already announced that we'll be there at least through 2006.
Bush is really getting ahead of himself (again). He's so incredibly eager to declare victory that he's not actually looking at reality. And he's just asking for something to occur that will require him to backpedal (again) and make up excuses (lies) to cover his arse, all the while making himself and our country look like foolish blowhards.
5 Comments:
At 12:13 PM PST, Anonymous said…
The people who voted dont agree with your ranting. Polls closed,,,election over,,,why? because there are no Kerrys and Boxers in Iraq
At 2:56 PM PST, Phil said…
No Kerry or Boxer or Gore. True. But there are representatives from both the Supreme Council for the Islamic Revolution and the Islamic Dawa Party, as well as folks like Chalabi. Will you (and Bush) still consider the election a "resounding success" if Abdel-Aziz al-Hakim (the head of the Supreme Council for the Islamic Revolution, and who has close ties to Iran) wins control? Or Chalabi (a convicted felon on the run, wanted for counterfeit & embezzlement in Iraq, and who is suspected of selling US secrets to Iran)?
Let's even say it's not someone as extreme. Will it still be a "resounding success" if whoever is elected tells the US to get our troops out of Iraq now? Will is still be a success if the results are challenged and fought over for the next year? Or if the fundamentalists/extremists work the masses up enough over "election fraud" to start a full on civil war?
Bush declared "mission accomplished" 21 months ago. Yet we've still been working hard to accomplish the mission for all that time. Nearly 2 full years later we're still seeing coalition soldiers, western civilians and Iraqi civilians get killed because the mission isn't really complete.
You obviously missed the whole point. Declaring the elections a "resounding success" before the first vote was cast is like contratulating the Eagles on the Super Bowl victory today, even though the game hasn't happened yet. Let's at least wait until the results are in before declaring them a success.
At 5:42 PM PST, Anonymous said…
"It ain't over until it's over" definitely applies to this election!
http://pimme.blog-city.com
At 6:22 PM PST, Anonymous said…
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
At 6:25 PM PST, Robin said…
1) You are not an idiot.
2) People who are lacking genitalia accessories (read "balls") post as "anonymous."
3) "Anonymous" is an idiot
4.) Amen and Hallelujah, sister. You are preaching my tune.
5.)Thanks for stopping by my place via Michele!
Post a Comment
<< Home